Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

33 Kommentare
They aren’t just quiet. Online they are actually spinning conspiracies against the protestors and supporting the „loyalist“ Ayatollah forces. Don’t visit r/asksocialists . It’s like a window to another universe.
The article argues that there is a glaring hypocrisy among Western activists, the media, and institutions like the UN, who remain silent on the Iranian regime’s brutal oppression of protesters despite their vocal support for Gaza. The author suggests this double standard exists because the Iranian struggle does not fit into popular „colonizer versus colonized“ narratives, leading cultural elites and the press to ignore a genuine human rights nightmare. Ultimately, the piece concludes that this selective outrage implies the „Free Palestine“ movement is not truly driven by a concern for freedom or the welfare of innocent people.
It has been like a week, and its already over. When it gets to 2 years and 160,000 dead check again. Are the Iranian protests that much different from the anti ICE protests in Minnesota? This is just disingenuous. Maybe the US needs some regime change?
Maybe lighting all the world on fire at once stretches compassion to breaking and maybe people should stop being arsonists…
The US sanctions Iran. What would they even be protesting for? Very few people want to get dragged into another war in the Middle East.
Their governments already oppose Iran
Western governments don’t have free trade deals with Iran, nor do they provide material or political cover for Iran. They condemn the Iranian government regularly and have even bombed Iran. So why would people in the west need to protest? Pro Palestinian protesters were protesting against their own government’s support for genocide
What do you want them to do? “We demand this institution divest from Iran! Wow, that was fast”
Also I think there are plenty of pressing domestic issues to protest at this point in time
This is such an odd take. Half the reason pro-Palestinian activists make a ruckus about Palestine is because there are direct US dollars going to aid Israel. It is an issue with which we are distinctly involved and if you believe it’s wrong then you call to sever that relationship. Where was it then implied that the United States has a responsibility to play world police for every single other bad thing that happens? Considerable difference between my taxpayer dollars being used to fund war crimes and a country across the world having its own conflicts that I’m not part of.
There’s no selective outrage, it’s just an egregious misappropriation of what the principle of movement is. I don’t believe the United States should stop every bad thing in the world from happening, just that it should stop funding those bad things where it does. Setting up the idea that the outrage against Israel is “selective” or somehow unique opens the door to assigning “other motivations” for anti-Israel criticisms, which is yet another pathetic war crime excusing dogwhistle
The reason is that leftists protest for things that are not supported by the goverment, because if they are, what is there to protest? If you think the goverment isnt concerned enough about X then you protest, but if you are content at the level of support your goverment has for X then you dont need to compel them to change course
The Pro-Gaza left isn’t really Pro-Gaza. It’s just anti-American. They hate the US primarily and see everything else through that friend-enemy distinction lens.
If someone is America’s enemy, then they are their friend, and vice versa. Israel is the US’s ally, and therefore is white/western/imperial/colonialist aligned, and therefore is an enemy. Opponents of Israel are definitionally opponents of the US, and therefore their friend. IRGC? US enemy, and therefore must be their ally. Protests against the Ayatollahs? Against a US enemy, so they must be US friendly and are therefore illegitimate.
All justifications and explanations can be traced to this framing. There is very little critical analysis that these people do to determine alignment beyond generalized opposition to the US led global order.
I wish the Dems could create a coalition without this action. The Gazabots/Berniecrats are a net negative for the party and very unreliable as a voting bloc. I wish we could create a new coalition without them but I do not know how feasible that is.
What’s with this sudden rash of „if you don’t express your opinion about [insert current event], then your position on [thing I care about] is invalid“ arguments I’m seeing online? Did the disinformation bots pivot their preferred line of thinking? And I’m sure this will come as a shock to everyone, but the author of this piece has a *very partisan* opinion on conflict in Gaza. Given that this article is published on WSJ, I bet you can guess which side the author comes down on.
It’s also profoundly disingenuous. Mr. Ondrasik dedicated a song to the hostages in Gaza. Did he do the same for ongoing humanitarian crises in Burkino Faso? Has he been vocal in support of either Russia or Ukraine? What’s his take on the situation in Xinjiang? Can he even pronounce Uyghur? If the answer to any of these questions is „we don’t know,“ then his argument applies to himself as readily as everyone he’s apparently throwing shade at.
The situation in Iran is largely opaque to outsiders, its two primary factions are both internal to the state as opposed to one being a foreign invader as in Gaza, there’s a history of outside intervention in internal Iranian conflicts creating adverse outcomes for everyone (including the existence of the regime the author presumably opposes), it’s not clear if the conditions that led to these protests would be addressed or exacerbated by the fall of the regime, etc. Given the complexity of the situation and how new it is, it’s kind of obnoxious to be fake-mad because someone hasn’t staked out their position on the matter. But if men like Ondrasik cared at all about being fair, they probably wouldn’t hold the positions they do anyway.
One is an internal civil war, the other is an ethnic cleansing…not really apples to apples
It would be anti-US to be very public with that sentiment. Someone in the US could get in trouble with one of the Trump administration EOs.
I feel like this article and take show a fundamental misunderstanding (whether intentional or otherwise) of who the left is and what they believe, and why they were protesting in favor of palestine, or why theyre skeptical about interventionism
The point of protests is to make demands. The “pro-Gaza” protests are not there to say “Look at us, we don’t like what Israel is doing to Gaza”, they’re there because Israel crucially relies on the US’s support, so there are arguably no protesters anywhere who are in a better position to weaken Israel and force some kind of change.
The opposite is true of Iran. The US is already sanctioning it and now Trump is explicitly calling on its people to overthrow the government and threatening military action. So if we accept the author’s anti-Iran stance, then what is there to protest about?
Disingenuous argument designed to discredit the pro-palestine movement. Riddle me this, what benefit is there to protest Iran in the US. It would just be symbolic. Anti-Israel protests actually had articulated goals in mind
It’s because those same omnicause supporters also support the Islamic regime…
The pro-Gaza left is on the other side of this. They’re not the ones that are going to come out for a secularist revolution in Iran.
That is not the point. The point is, who is? Iranian opposition definitely needs some champions in the west.
I wish Hitch was still alive. He’d know how to rustle up a crowd.
The West isn’t arming Iran. The West was arming Israel.
This isn’t geopolitics, this is US social politics.
This isnt geopolitics
This is all about pro-Israel media and politicians and the noise they are creating.
The „Pro-Gaza Left“ has high visibility due to being constantly attacked by pro-Israeli media and politicians.
Any noise made by the „Pro-Gaza Left“ about Iran is ignored by the pro-Israel media and politicians.
Which group in the West even supports Iran? It has no allies, no support from the West. What is there to demonstrate against?
It is not. But if everyone condemns you don’t need to be extra loud like in Gaza.
Even if it’s unreasonable to expect that the pro-Gaza left organize protests on behalf of Iranians, isn’t it worthy of criticism that so many of them are just completely silent on the subject?
Like, I understand the concept that it’s more important to physically protest on behalf of Gaza because Western governments have trade and military relations with Israel that could be used to pressure Israel. But the same people who screamed at the top of their lungs about oppression and universal values for two years can’t even bring themselves to make a single Instagram post saying „we stand in solidarity with the people of Iran?“ The DSA chapters who’ve been screeching hysterically about the Palestinians can’t even manage the most performative slacktivist efforts on behalf of Iranians?
Ok? They’re going through different things that attract different levels of attention. Theres lots of stuff going on that leftists can care about.
Unsurprising. It’s a political movement and psyop that’s has been thoroughly propagandized by the Iranian government.
Probably because there wasn’t a social media rollout of propaganda / active measures that globalized the Instagram stories of newbies to Geopolitics.
Hamas ran one of the most successful rebranding (and fundraising campaigns I’m sure) of any terrorist organization in history. Goebbels would have stood and applauded.
Hopefully the watermelon emojis get wise and wake up. Maybe they’ll get involved in geopolitics beyond helping a terrorist thug state rebrand.
But they’re fairly *occupied* with ICE right now and their IG stories can only handle so much.
This is so stupid. The west cut of Iran decades ago. Western governments continue to supply Isreal military equipment they use to murder innocent people. What do you expect them to protest?!
Cause the election is over
They will talk about it when the US intervenes in Iran and the Palestine supporters will protest by holding signs such as „Hands Off Iran“, „Trump is a war criminal“ & „Choose The Right Side of History“.