"Diese Vereinbarung ermöglicht eine engere Zusammenarbeit zwischen der NASA und dem Energieministerium, um die notwendigen Fähigkeiten bereitzustellen, um das Goldene Zeitalter der Weltraumforschung und -entdeckung einzuleiten."
The US really wants a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030. 'Achieving this future requires harnessing nuclear power,' NASA chief says
byu/Astrox_YT inAstroxia_SRT
16 Kommentare
~~Artemis is down to three missions total, with its ship being retired after Artemis III.~~ One moon landing over the last decade+ of the project. And now we’re supposed to get a nuclear reactor on the moon in 4 years, with a fraction of the budget that it took to get a man on the moon in 10? what are they thinking.
If they want a golden age of space exploration, they need to fund NASA seriously. Otherwise any aggressive plan like this is all talk.
Edit: Fixed out of date information in my comment. Artemis III is not the end of the program, that was part of a budget proposal that was rejected by Congress. I still maintain that the pace we are going means 2030 is an absurd deadline for nuclear reactor on the moon.
How are they going to do that without water?
This is absolutely not happening.
What will happen is billions of tax dollars laundered in straight up bribes and kickbacks to the regime’s buddies. The US Gov. is so incredibly rife with corruption right now that they’re more likely to get Homer Simpson’s model nuclear plant strapped to a bottle rocket than a reactor on the moon.
Can we plz get nuclear reactors on EARTH????
Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if these clowns say they’ll build a coal plant there…
The sooner the stigma around anything nuclear dissolves, the better. So many possibilities can be unlocked.
Nawww best the US can do is more gold for their orange Master.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180007389/downloads/20180007389.pdf
One proposed option has already been built and demonstrated.
Good luck nasa, I’m more certain the current administration will try to drill the moon for oil before getting nuclear power there
[deleted]
So much money for boiling water in space.
Have fun figuring out the cooling issue with a fraction of a percent of the DoD’s budget.
Would be nice if we could get nuclear reactors on EARTH first, for PEOPLE.
Hopefully that rocket with nuclear material doesnt blow up over Florida..
Watching for all mankind show makes me upset that our reality could have been vastly sped up if we committed more to exploration.
„Achieving this future requires harnessing nuclear power,‘ NASA chief says“
I sure hope America is successful in harnessing nuclear power. And putting first man on the moon? Amazing!