Kritisieren Sie den Einbruch des Bitcoin-Treasury-Bereichs? Nun, Michael Saylor möchte mit Ihnen sprechen.
An einem 12. Januar Was Bitcoin getan hat Podcast: Der Gründer von Strategy und Erfinder des Treasury-Handels für digitale Vermögenswerte geriet außer sich, als der Interviewer Danny Knowles ihn fragte, ob der Markt mit den mehr als 200 Staatsanleihen umgehen könne, die sich derzeit selbst als Staatsanleihen bezeichnen – und ob ihr Modell der Ausgabe von Schulden zum Kauf von Bitcoin tatsächlich nachhaltig sei.
„Wer sagen Sie, dass sie nur Schulden ausgeben, um Bitcoin zu kaufen?“ antwortete Saylor. „Das ist einfach eine ignorante und beleidigende Aussage Ihrerseits.“
Saylors Ausbruch kommt zu einem beunruhigenden Zeitpunkt für die Staatskassen. Fast 40 % der 100 größten Bitcoin-Staatsanleihen werden mit einem Abschlag gehandelt – der Schlüsselkennzahl, die es ihnen ermöglicht, mehr Kapital zur Finanzierung ihrer Bitcoin-Käufe aufzubringen – und mehr als 60 % haben Bitcoin zu höheren Preisen als heute gekauft.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/michael-saylor-slams-interviewer-questioning-191458805.html
15 Kommentare
Saylor is an old school degen like us
tldr; Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, defended his Bitcoin treasury model during a podcast interview, calling questions about its sustainability ‚ignorant and offensive.‘ Saylor’s company has issued significant debt to purchase Bitcoin, becoming the largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally. Critics question the viability of companies adopting similar models, as many are struggling financially. Saylor argues Bitcoin adoption is akin to embracing new technology, dismissing concerns about competition or sustainability in the treasury space.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
If all the BTC treasuries start trading below NAV, wouldn’t that start a cascade of selling should one of them have to sell? I would think this game theory could go in reverse, in order to stop further eroding the net asset value to stock value there could be a rush to sell the treasury to stop the sliding. This then starts the unwinding of the flywheel. Any thoughts?
It is offensive. Criticizing companies for buying bitcoin, regardless of the current market opinion of those companies, is an offensive premise. What’s offensive is that there are massive companies that own zero bitcoin.
He was right though, the interviewer just mimicked all the Crypto Bro’s, I find it strange when people just get into this mantra mode, whatever it is.
For me, it’s a simple question, is buying BTC good or not at any given time for what the future will bring??
It’s a yes, it’s good for me, but I understand anyone with a completely opposite view!
I’m kind of on Salyor’s side – He’s been barking up this tree for like 5 years. I don’t blame him.
If you disagree you’re just a wall street banker shill. Nobody cares about your dying business model
Well let’s do a thought experiment, if literally every person in the world created a personal bitcoin treasury, they’d have no need for fiat currency except maybe to pay taxes but then Bitcoin would be fundamentally 1000x more useful and the early DATs would be worth it.
How dare you criticizing our leader Saylor! /s
Totally not a fraudster!
Ooof. When someone blows their top for a statement of fact you know shit is fucked.
Another Forbes cover that will go down in infamy.
„Who are you to say they’re just issuing debt to buy Bitcoin?“
Fair point, Mikey, maybe they’ll issue debt to buy other things, or will keep diluting stock to buy it.
He’s about to crack
Oh okay so he’s just going to act like Trump. Any criticism is a crime apparently
Can’t wait til he goes bankrupt