Die Satzung von Mississauga, die hohes Gras regelt, verstößt gegen das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung und Gerichtsurteile

City argued it wrong. It should have been Ruck’s infringement on neighbours. Why do neighbours have to deal with extra weeds as a result of Ruck’s intent? I’d argue that the guy is imposing his beliefs on neighbours, regardless of their position on the subject, as there is no way to contain seedlings only to his property.