
Microsoft AI-CEO warnt vor existenziellen Risiken und drängt auf globale Regulierungen
Microsoft AI CEO Warns of Existential Risks, Urges Global Regulations

Microsoft AI-CEO warnt vor existenziellen Risiken und drängt auf globale Regulierungen
Microsoft AI CEO Warns of Existential Risks, Urges Global Regulations
20 Kommentare
„Suleyman emphasizes that without rigorous controls, AI could spiral beyond human oversight, posing existential risks to society.
Suleyman’s concerns are not abstract; they stem from concrete observations of current AI trajectories. In a recent discussion reported by The Independent, he stated bluntly, “If we can’t control it, it isn’t going to be on our side.” This sentiment echoes across multiple platforms, highlighting a growing unease among industry leaders. Suleyman argues that AI systems, if allowed to become “uncontrollable,” could lead to unintended consequences, from economic disruption to broader societal upheaval. He points to the accelerating pace of development, where models are trained on massive datasets and computational power, potentially enabling self-improvement loops that humans might not anticipate or halt.“
„He envisions a future where AI amplifies human potential, but only if risks are mitigated early. „
It’s not really Co-Pilot that I’m worried about given how crap it is and no-one really using it anyway.
I like to think that AGI already exists and it quickly realised humans are not compatible with perfection, so it is sabotaging every aspect of society in hopes that we will destroy ourselves.
Keeps pushing AI down our throats in every possible way…urges regulation and restrictions. Pricks.
There is far to much a stake to put on the breaks. Ultimately, in the eyes of people like Sam Altman the race for AGI is a race to see who creates a superpower that is likely to replace most, if not all human work forces giving the winner total do dominance.
Not a chance in hell that they will put on the breaks.
Between this guy and Bill Gates sounding alarms, it’s almost like MSFT is trying to build some defense against future liability.
„please regulate us so we can blame the goverment for our failure!!“
„What an unexpected and totally unforeseen consequence of the actions I took!“
If Microsoft is against it then it’s probably something good. They’re a terrible company.
Spoiler: like every big corporation, they’ve written the regulations they want ratified already, and are seeking/paying politicians to put in place.
While supporting AI? Arguably the biggest most pointless reinforcer of climate change?
Apparently very few people seem to understand that this man is actually speaking the truth about this, as are the top 3 most cited AI researchers (Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, Ilya Sutskever) when they say superhuman AI could kill us all.
Yeah, we’re in trouble.
Every time I hear some AI tech big-wig say some shit like this my first thought is that its primary purpose is advertising. “Yes, this technology is *totally* going to be capable of doing all these things at some indeterminate point in the future!”
Leave it to humans to make humans obsolete. Bring me back to the early 90’s.
It’s more clear than ever that no body currently holds enough power to enforce laws worldwide. Digital or otherwise
It’s also clear that Microsoft knows this and any calls for regulation made by groups actively lobbying against regulation are essentially just PR/ advertising
The only thing we have to fear is big corps and new norm of infinite lying governments
First, you support a presidential candidate who promised to destroy the world order. Then, when he’s elected, you cheer his crazy policies. Then, he proceeds to destroy that world order, which was the only tiny sliver of chance of negotiating and reaching mutual agreements on regulation (unlikely, but still the only chance). Now, you ask for global regulation… I have the feeling he’s either BSing everyone (most likely), or he and his fellow CEOs are just f*ing dumb.
No global regulation with people like Trump will ever be possible.
They must’ve realized that they’re too far behind their competition and need to slow them down enough to catch up.
I feel like they are now embedded into everything NOW they want regulation so some young upstart can’t come steal their crown.
I’d rather just shut it all down instead of regulating it.