NASA-Chef lobt den Teenager Matteo Paz dafür, dass er mithilfe von KI Neowise-Daten analysiert und 1,5 Millionen versteckte Sterne entdeckt hat |
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/nasa-chief-praises-teen-matteo-paz-for-using-ai-to-analyse-neowise-data-and-discover-1-5-million-hidden-stars/articleshow/126231762.cms
9 Kommentare
This post relates to the future of scientific research and data analysis. It shows how advances in AI may change how discoveries are made, not by relying only on new missions, but by reprocessing large volumes of existing data from past projects. As datasets continue to grow faster than human analysis can keep up, similar approaches could become common across astronomy, climate science, and other fields, potentially accelerating discovery while reducing the need for costly new instruments.
We’ve allowed the marketing dudes to fuck us. AI in this case isn’t AI like how it’s used in common terms though it’s still not AI. This appears to be a Machine Learning system with scientific rigors. The headline blurs GenAI and ML and other technology and now people will think ChatGPT can analyze this shit in a meaningful way.
That aside, this is so fucking cool. We discovered 1.5 million stars we never knew we had. If these are genuinely there that’s hundreds of thousands of systems to ponder and study.
Nowadays any use of any algorithm is immediately equals use of Ai. Tomorrow any use of computer will equals use of Ai. Day after that any own human thot will be not even remotely possible without any use of Ai.
I vote for reboot!
Nice! We were running out of stars to study anyway, this came in clutch!!!
I feel bad for that kid. Now he’s going to spend the rest of his life naming his discoveries. No time for a career, has to name stars.
I like the news I see here, good stuff.
Nice on the star finding young man.
That is even better than writing Winamp.
,
As a heads up— As a rule of thumb, I’d caution folks about pay long attention to this publication as credible. India Times “news” outlet has massive credibility issues, particularly with receiving payments to write favorable articles.… so basically ads, not facts.
I wouldn’t be shocked if they’re sensationalizing these kind of stories to paint a positive spin on “how cool AI is” or something like that.
At a very least, I’d be looking to verify this story being published with outlets that are more familiar/credible. Anytime I see this outlet when I’m browsing for credible sources of information, this one gets ignored.
How dare this teen use AI for this, doesn’t he know how many people could have had a job doing this manually instead?!
When you use AI in NASA, they praise you, when I do it, I get banned from school.