Hindus warnen Labour vor einer „abschreckenden“ Definition von Islamophobie

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/05/hindus-warn-keir-steeve-reed-islamophobia-definition/

Von StGuthlac2025

31 Kommentare

  1. Sensitive_Echo5058 on

    „Hindu community leaders have warned Sir Keir Starmer that Labour’s new Islamophobia definition will have a “significant chilling effect” on freedom of speech.
    They say it conflates hostility towards Muslims with criticism of the religion of Islam, which would mean Hindus speaking about their historical persecution under Islamic empires in South Asia would fall foul of the definition.

    Last week, the Hindu Council UK wrote a letter to Steve Reed, the Communities Secretary, saying there was a “serious” risk that the definition could suppress legitimate criticism of contemporary Islamist ideology out of fear of breaching a “poorly defined standard of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’”.

    It also claimed that it could also lead to the backdoor reintroduction of a blasphemy law that would protect Islam without according the same rights to other religions.

    “By granting heightened protection to a religion-linked identity through concepts such as ‘racialisation’ and ‘collective stereotyping’, the proposed definition continues to risk shielding Islamic beliefs and practices from scrutiny in practice, if not in law,” the council said.

    “This is especially troubling given that the UK deliberately abolished blasphemy laws to ensure that no belief system is beyond challenge.”

  2. StGuthlac2025 on

    Question for any Muslims out there. How do you feel about the definition and bringing it into law?

  3. pubemaster_uno on

    It is entirely rational to be fearful of Islam. The idea of making it illegal to express this fear is insane.

  4. Electricbell20 on

    The last one full definition I saw.

    >Anti-Muslim hostility is engaging in or encouraging criminal acts, including acts of violence, vandalism of property, and harassment and intimidation whether physical, verbal, written or electronically communicated, which is directed at Muslims or those perceived to be Muslims because of their religion, ethnicity or appearance.

    I can understand why some Hindu groups would have issues.

  5. Goosepond01 on

    I don’t see why poltical and ideological groups need laws against people being critical of them.

    shall we bring in a law that forbids people making fun of the EDL or Reform?

  6. Cersei-Lannisterr on

    I thought punishing people for criticising aspects of a religion was something we got rid of?

  7. What a joke that we even have to consider a law for this – it should be ok to ridicule, criticise and make fun of any religion – full stop. There’s no Islamic race and its purely an ancient ideology along with all the rest. Shit show in the making this is.

  8. GreenSpectr3 on

    Haven’t really looked into it. Is it likely that this new definition will go ahead? Is it equivalent to the IHRA definition of antisemitism?

  9. Horror_Extension4355 on

    I think this is all wild in the context of what happened to the Batley school teacher and the immediate reaction at that time of the local politicians.

  10. Jews murdered at a synagogue in Manchester? Police thwarted plans for a second, bigger attack last week?

    Better curb Islamophobia lol

  11. SaltEOnyxxu on

    This is an objectively terrible idea as the Hindus have outlined. Why aren’t the other religious groups so heavily protected? We don’t like two tier policing and one religious group shouldn’t be protected above the rest.

    Islamaphobia doesn’t exist, criticism of Islam, and racism exist.

  12. AMoonMonkey on

    No religion or ideology should be immune from criticism, nor should people be expected to simply “co-exist” with a religion that in recent times has historically been known to have members blow themselves up, behead and immolate people and so on.

    It’s ridiculous.

  13. 11912121121218211919 on

    Hey guys, I racially identify as catholic.

    See how dumb that is? Islam isn’t a race.

  14. hopefully a group of British ethnic minorities criticising this will actually convince the government ( and others ) to stop following this dangerous course.

    Unfortunately if only white people are the ones making a fuss it just gives ammunition to the prejudices and preconceptions of a certain political group, albeit diverse group, of people very influential in this country’s cultural discourse. such is the state of things in the modern day.

    Modern Britain doesn’t need blasphemy laws. Period.

    Certain groups can coat it with all sorts of flowery language which ever way they want but that’s what this is and outlawing ( for all intents and purposes) the criticism of religion goes against a foundational pillar of Western liberal, thus British, culture.

  15. MediocreWitness726 on

    This should never happen – no religion especially this one should have this law

  16. Personal_Lab_484 on

    I mean off the bat it’s just guidelines. Not law.

    And secondly the wording is pretty chill. You can still say whatever you want about Islam.

    Go check the BBC article for a less biased source. I’m not especially worried.

    Also fuck Islam as a religion. Along with all religions.

  17. UnchartedPro on

    As a Muslim I don’t care if they recognise Islamaphobia as a definition

    We should be accountable for what we say and do

    If a Muslim defaced a Church they should be punished and if someone defaced a Mosque they should be punished

    We don’t need to make up terms for what should be common decency

  18. It’s absolutely ridiculous that this is even a thing, this country is going down the drain and Labour are a joke

  19. EagleAid2544 on

    Many muslims/ex-muslims have fled their counties and seeked refuge abroad because of their ‚Islamaphobia‘.
    Its Islam that has the phobias of our culture and ways of living. Please respect our country and you will be respected, much like the Hindus are! I fully agree with the Hindus warning to Starmer here!

  20. sarah_impalin76 on

    Most religions are free to preach that homosexuality is wrong in their books so people should be free to criticize the sheer ridiculousness of all religions there is a difference between critiquing a flawed belief system and discrimination I have many religious friends I believe that their religion is bad and will discuss it respectfully with them but I would never treat them badly because they are following beliefs that they were taught to believe.

    I do think people have the right to religious freedom and that freedom should include the right to question criticize and satire religion. Other wise we are screwed and freedom of speech becomes a concept rather than a reality.

  21. SunMoonSnake on

    As an anecdote, I heard a story where a Kashmiri Hindu in the UK was prevented from talking about her family’s ethnic cleansing by Islamists due to threats of „Islamophobia“.

  22. charlatanfrompast on

    They should write a letter to Modi as well who is ruining india using far right hindu extremists

  23. Ok-Juggernaut-7972 on

    Labour made it so if you criticise Israel murdering everyone then you’re anti-semitic, so I’m sure this will be fine.  

  24. People saying this is unnecessary as though we didn’t have racist hooligans rioting and people trying to burn down mosques.

  25. being-a-noob on

    Their religion shouldn’t get special treatment / protection. All religions should be treated the same by law and freedom of speech is the most important thing.

  26. According-Secret9516 on

    It strikes me as odd how the Telegraph is keen to remind us of the Mughals but silent on British rule.

  27. Competitive_Pen7192 on

    I’d sooner the UK goes entirely secular.

    Leave your religion at the door and enter a society where people focus on doing the right thing for each other.

    But that’s a laughable prospect sadly.

Leave A Reply