Jedes Mal, wenn ich sehe, dass diese Reform oder ähnliche Neuigkeiten Familien helfen, ärgere ich mich. Es gibt keine Singles in Lux?! Als Single kostet alles mehr. Wer braucht also mehr Hilfe? Ich verstehe diese Diskriminierung nicht und warum die Medien nichts sagen.
https://www.luxtimes.lu/luxembourg/tax-reforms-will-help-families-purchasing-power-says-luxembourg-prime-minister/121759635.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawPJ9-xicmlkETBRSmZCNFVQOW5KUXFsNnlwc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHvK7IsNGDu6G7L4t5AucR4Baev_8fMeJDvw77kYLhAVkBp50WKtdbuvwbpXv
Von DotDry
8 Kommentare
People who are single get the same advantage – from tax class 1 to 1A.
Well in case it helps you, still with a family you end up with much less.
I guess they cannot help everyone, so they should prioritize. And help for families is about our future, including the future for single people.
I still don’t understand how this can help families. Do you? It wont, at best they wont pay more. The state budget is in deficit. They either need to increase taxes or reduces the spendings. Borrowing is not a real solution.
Consider additional cost that are coming + pension deficit + shrinking private sector employment + increasing public sector employment. It seems people are going to pay.
They should rather reduce public spending by increasing efficiencies and competition in the public sector
Its really simple if you think like this,
People are not getting married and not making any children. So there will be a big gap in coming years for the state funding, less people working with high expenses in state level doesn’t meet any standard. You have to remind yourself that you are in a developed western country.
The next option you can have is bring more workers to Luxembourg, and currently it’s at it’s peak and the development has been at it’s highest level and there is nothing you can develop in this country except housing, which is like a monopoly in here with old people and private equity firms holding more houses and not wanting to build more because they control the market and if more house means more supply and it will break there current prices.
Also now a days government incentives more children policy, so they can run this scam and race with them. So the future generations will pay for their current system.
If you are alone and not having child you pay higher tax, they will ease you if you are having more children. Having children means good to economy and bad for parents because of the expense with current inflation and stopped salary growth.
Can anyone recommend a source that actually explains the changes? As I understand, couples currently benefit from « flattening » their income if one earns much more than the other. Not exactly, but along the lines of a single €100,000 earner can pay taxes as if they are two €50,000 earners.
This article then makes claims that the reforms will dramatically reduce the tax bill of couples earning €50,000, €75,000, €125,000 (each?) but also says that you can keep your class 2 for 25 years if you like it. I truly don’t understand why this article doesn’t just explain in brackets and rates the proposed changes! Are there any changes to class 1 proposed?! No information given.
I find it amusing that there’s so much talk about tax fairness etc. without ever mentioning the elephant in the room: income from capital.
Just put your millions in some ETF and every time you need money (e.g. regularly each month) you just sell some shares (held for 6 months). Effective tax rate on the accumulated gains: 0%.
Meanwhile people doing actual work in the best interest of society are taxed to hell and back, whether in 2025 or 2028.