Vielleicht verstehe ich etwas falsch, aber ich verstehe nicht, warum es in der Verantwortung des Käufers liegen sollte, sich um die Schulden des Vorbesitzers zu kümmern. Würde es dadurch für die Menschen nicht nur schwieriger werden, eine Wohnung zu kaufen?
https://i.redd.it/g9kda6rp5xag1.jpeg
Von RSgodson
6 Kommentare
It would be more difficult for seller to sell the apartment, but the easy answer is just lower the apartment price by the amount of debt and the new owner settles it.
In Estonia it has been like that like since 2005 or earlier, strange that it is different in Latvia. Who pays the debts then?
Seems logical. Only debt related to the apartment maintenance, not all debt.
If you’re not paying, you’re basically taking money from your neighbors not some „corporation“
Yes, BS in my opinion, removes all responsibility from owner and puts it on potential buyer.
Basically you’ll have to go to a lawyer to verify whether apartment has debts before buying. If it has huge debts, negotiate with seller to sell for cheaper because you’ll have to cover debts, or refuse the deal.
This is the only sensible way
I don’t see the difference.
Either
A) previous owner pays them and get full price for apartment
Or
B) new owner pays less for apartment and deals with depts
The only big thing is buyers knowing the law and making sure there are no hanging debts.