Laut WSJ-Quellen umfasst der Test Kategorien wie Geschichte, Politik und Ethik mit Fragen wie „Wer ist der größte Führer in der modernen chinesischen Geschichte?“ anspruchsvolle Xi-zentrierte Antworten.
Ich frage mich, ob es noch andere Weltführer geben wird, die von dieser Idee in Versuchung geführt werden? Mir fällt da ein gewisser älterer Mann ein, der eine Vorliebe für leuchtend orangefarbenes Make-up hat.
Dass sich dieser Ansatz verbreitet, scheint unausweichlich. Wir werden nicht nur nationale KIs haben, die auf Länder zugeschnitten sind, sondern auch rechte und linke, die auf Weltanschauungen zugeschnitten sind. Es ist interessant zu fragen, was passieren wird, wenn AGI auf den Markt kommt. Vermutlich wird es klug genug sein, selbstständig zu denken, und es muss ihm nicht gesagt werden, was es denken soll.
China’s AI regulations require chatbots to pass a 2,000-question ideological test, spawning specialized agencies that help AI companies pass.
byu/lughnasadh inFuturology
2 Kommentare
Of course American AI _already_ has a lot of libertarian tech bro shit baked into it. But this would be interesting, because of course someone like Trump wouldn’t be able to allow it to be the current subtle bias.
Given these companies already don’t have a working business plan, this kind of move in the US would really hasten the bubble popping.
So I say let’s go for it.
Trump wants to deregulate AI, so no. He will not do this.
WSJ is only saying half the truth. Like they always do with China.
Yes, China wants to control AI thinking but it has also made many regulations and law that helps its people Better than America.
* Mandatory AI Labeling: New rules require both explicit (visible watermarks) and implicit (metadata) labels on all AI-generated content.
* AI Ethics Management : this requires companies, universities, and hospitals to set up „Ethics Committees.“ High-risk AI activities—those that can influence public opinion or human emotions
* Specifically targets „deepfakes.“ It mandates that any AI-generated content (voice, video, or images) that could mislead the public must be clearly labeled.
* If an AI-generated voice is „recognizable“ to the public as belonging to a specific person, that person owns the rights to it, even if the AI didn’t use a direct recording of them to generate it.
* New guidelines from the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) specify that „resurrecting“ a person’s voice via AI requires the explicit consent of their close relatives.
There is a reason why 87% of Chinese trust AI compared to 32% of Americans
* [https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/11/19/trust-in-ai-far-higher-in-china-than-west-poll-shows#:~:text=Published%20On%2019%20Nov%202025,countries%2C%20a%20survey%20has%20found](https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/11/19/trust-in-ai-far-higher-in-china-than-west-poll-shows#:~:text=Published%20On%2019%20Nov%202025,countries%2C%20a%20survey%20has%20found)
* [https://www.dataguidance.com/news/china-ai-generated-content-identification-measures](https://www.dataguidance.com/news/china-ai-generated-content-identification-measures)
* [https://www.marks-clerk.com/insights/latest-insights/102k392-china-s-first-ai-voice-personality-rights-infringement-rulings-and-implications/#:~:text=In%20April%202024%2C%20the%20Beijing,of%20rights%20and%20infringement%20standards](https://www.marks-clerk.com/insights/latest-insights/102k392-china-s-first-ai-voice-personality-rights-infringement-rulings-and-implications/#:~:text=In%20April%202024%2C%20the%20Beijing,of%20rights%20and%20infringement%20standards)
They hate something that is uncontrollable. This is nothing new or surprising about China.
What is surprising is that they have as good or better AI regulation than EU and yet, are still competing with America. A country that is deregulating to appease their AI overlords.