- Die USA, Kanada und Mexiko liegen alle unter dem Bevölkerungsersatz Fruchtbarkeitsrate.
- Anhaltend niedrige Geburtenraten unterhalb der Schlüsselschwelle von 2,1 können dazu führen Bevölkerungsrückgang.
- Die Daten für diese Grafik stammen aus den Schätzungen der UN World Population Prospects für 2025.
Von Informerbytes
15 Kommentare
„Most of north America is below replacement level.“
Right, because South America is exploding with high birth rates? Colombia and Brazil 1.6, wow that is low. Talk to me about a dying population. Chile 1.1, wow.
Literally South America is likely to lose people fast than north America based on the map’s data.
This doesn’t take into account immigration though.
The map points to migration as contributing to US population growth but this appears to be a thing of the past under the Trump administration.
It’s okay for our human population to decline
It’s good for Earth
Can’t keep popping out babies with our rigged economic system
Good we need fewer people.
Inb4 even MORE economically illiterate people say “Good”
Canada has rebounded to 1.5.
Long hair, don’t care.
So what? Why does this frighten you? Are you a billionaire who needs spenders and wage slaves?
But the population increaea because immigration
>Persistently low fertility rates below the key 2.1 threshold can result in population declines.
Good, there are too many people on the planet as it is. The fewer people there are, the more valuable each individual becomes. High population growth only benefits fatcat Wall Street 1%ers.
Forget the North America continent, most of the world is below the population replacement rate.
It seemed like just a few years ago they were pumping the ‘over-crowded world’ panic
So is most of S America. The difference is a sane immigration policy would result in a lot of immigrants with the necessary skills moving to the US or Canada especially.
Versus Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, etc.
I remember when I was little the stereotype was that Mexicans reproduced a lot