Close Menu
    Verschwörung

    Letzte Woche versprachen sie, dass das Einzige, was die Ukraine am Sieg hindere, 61 Milliarden Dollar seien. Jetzt sagen sie, es sei nicht genug. Warum schicken wir weiterhin Geld in die Ukraine?


    Letzte Woche versprachen sie, dass das Einzige, was die Ukraine am Sieg hindere, 61 Milliarden Dollar seien. Jetzt sagen sie, es sei nicht genug. Warum schicken wir weiterhin Geld in die Ukraine?

    Von jdhmdo

    View 19 Comments

    19 Comments

    3. Araminal on

      It’s a proxy war against Russia. Sending aid to Ukraine is financially cheaper for the US, and it weakens Russia while strengthening the US military. And no American military lives are lost.

    4. JoeHexotic on

      >The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.

      [George Orwell, 1984]

      Also, a quote from an essay he wrote that is 100% appropriate…

      >Every war, when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.

    5. UniqueImprovements on

      The United States of Israel and Ukraine.

      I mean, those are the citizens our government seems the most concerned with.

    7. HammunSy on

      youre doing the same thing in california I heard dealing with the homeless for example. why do these shock you when youre doing it right at home stateside.

    8. MidgicAirport on

      Because a proxy war against a powerful enemy state looking to gain more natural resources is is a good things for America, Americans, the west, and potentially the world… but more-so the first to… it is 100% strategically advantageous to fund Ukraine.

    9. PrestigiousEnd8726 on

      Ukraine is a scam to ramp up weapons production in the US. The US cannot deter China from invading Taiwan with 2022 levels of production. China likely believes that they will withstand a few hot months of war with the US but will be able to turn the tide once US precision weapons are exhausted and cannot be quickly replenished.

    11. Zealousideal-Part815 on

      Hmmm, the word “Win” does not fit this conflict. The only winner has been weapons manufacturers.

    12. cmhamm on

      I don’t think they said $60m would win the war. I think they said that not sending $60m would lose it. Those are two very different concepts.

    13. CatfishCatcherPT on

      Because you’re not really funding just Ukraine. The records should be public.

      I’m not an American, but if I was, I would want to know where and how the money is being spent.

    14. Consistent_Ad3181 on

      It’s not the winning really it’s bleeding Russia dry over time. Also creates money for the US military industrial complex. Lots of old kit gets swapped for new kit. Technology gets tried out. Sort of win win the longer it goes on. Of course kick backs might be a thing also 😉

    16. ifyou420 on

      Because none of this makes sense. ‘The Ukraine” is a region of Russia, not a nation. It will end when people realize this and abide by it.

    17. ErilazHateka on

      Nobody promised that.

      Why are you making such ridiculous claims?

      Edit: checked OP’s posting history. Now I know why.

    Leave A Reply